Loading…
Loading…
Shonen TCG · General
Attack of the Vine buy hold sell verdicts for week 1 post-launch. Iconic, Enchanted, Monsters Inc., Turning Red, and Hunny singles -- what to act on now.

Reviewing
Disney Lorcana
This Attack of the Vine buy hold sell guide covers the market four days post-launch, not the pre-launch speculation piece. Iconic prices are still up from launch weekend. Enchanted singles from Monsters Inc. characters are holding their premium. Competitive commons everyone needed in week 1 are already drifting back down as aggro hype cools.
TL;DR: Iconic cards are a hold or sell in week 1 -- prices drop 30-50% over the next 3-4 weeks as supply spreads. Enchanted prints from Monsters Inc. debut characters (Sulley, Boo) have a real collector floor worth buying if you want them for display. Competitive commons and uncommons identified post-prerelease are safe buys now. Anything that spiked purely because aggro ran the table in rush week is a sell before the meta correction arrives.
Attack of the Vine launched July 24. Four days in, the market pattern looks exactly like Wilds Unknown did at the same point: Iconic and Enchanted singles near their price ceiling, competitive commons starting to normalize, a few rush-week performers overpriced relative to their actual competitive role. Most buyers should wait. Anyone holding inflated launch-week singles should move them before week 2 meta corrections land.
The Iconic cards in Attack of the Vine are the rarest pulls in the set, sitting above Enchanted in the rarity hierarchy. Wilds Unknown showed exactly what these cards do after launch: they peak early, then bleed value steadily for a month.
In Set 12, Merida sat around $1,274 and Buzz Lightyear reached approximately $4,500 at peak post-launch pricing. Both dropped meaningfully over the following 4-6 weeks. Players who bought at peak paid significantly more than anyone who waited until week 5.
Set 13's Iconics are on the same track. Four days in, prices are still close to launch peaks. The sealed product that'll eventually bring them down is still being opened, and the initial rush from players who wanted one immediately got absorbed at top prices.
Verdict: wait. Unless you have a specific personal reason to buy right now -- say, you pulled a second copy at prerelease and want a display piece -- there's no financial case for week 1 prices. The window for peak prices is closing; the window for buying below peak is opening. Put a calendar reminder on week 3 and revisit.
If you pulled an Iconic at prerelease and don't plan to keep it: sell now. Launch-week demand from players who want one immediately is still real enough to support strong prices, but that window narrows every day.
GODEEPER: For the full breakdown of Iconic rarity pull rates and whether the math ever favors hunting them in sealed product, see our Disney Lorcana Iconic Rarity: Set 13 Collector Guide.
Enchanted cards use the same Art Nouveau illustration treatment from earlier Lorcana sets, pulling at roughly one per display box on average. What's different in Set 13 is that Monsters Inc., Turning Red, and Up are making their first significant appearances in the game. Debut franchise characters hold Enchanted value better than repeat appearances because there's no prior Enchanted version competing with them for collector attention.
The two Enchanted prints drawing the most attention four days post-launch are from the Monsters Inc. roster. Sulley and Boo have no prior Enchanted printing in Lorcana. Collectors who want them for display frames know this is their window for first-generation prints -- the kind of acquisition that looks obvious in hindsight. That puts a real floor under these cards compared to Enchanted prints of characters from sets that already have multiple versions.
Mei Lee from Turning Red carries a similar first-appearance premium. The red panda transformation design lends itself well to Art Nouveau treatment and the community response has reflected that.
Enchanted prices in week 1 are still elevated from prerelease hype, though. The best buying window for display collectors is week 2 to week 3, after the initial launch rush fades but before supply tightens on first-print run copies.
Verdict for debut-franchise Enchanted (Sulley, Boo, Mei Lee): buy if you want them, but week 2 pricing will likely be 15-25% lower. If you can't wait and you want a first-print copy, buying now locks in a known price. If you can hold off two weeks, do it.
Verdict for repeat-franchise Enchanted (characters that already have Enchanted prints in older sets): wait. These have the least floor protection and the most room to drop.
For a full breakdown of every Enchanted in Set 13, the Disney Lorcana Attack of the Vine Enchanted Cards Guide covers pull rates, art details, and competitive relevance for each one.
Monsters Inc. anchors the Emerald ink theme in Attack of the Vine. Deckbuilders and collectors are both eyeing the commons and uncommons from this IP, but for different reasons and with different risk profiles.
Competitively relevant Emerald commons and uncommons post-prerelease are sitting under $2 in most cases. That's where they should be. Speculating on these before the meta settles doesn't make sense -- the downside is minimal but so is the upside. If specific Monsters Inc. commons have identified roles in Emerald aggro or control lists, buy a playset now at launch prices before a meta spike pushes them up. Cards that slot into multiple archetypes are the safest buy.
Rush-week Emerald performers that overshot are a different situation. Prerelease results skew toward aggro because limited-format sealed rewards speed. Cards that looked dominant in sealed but don't have an obvious home in 60-card constructed will drop by week 2 when full meta data arrives.
Verdict for Monsters Inc. competitive commons/uncommons: buy identified staples now. Prices are low and the risk of a meaningful drop is limited.
Verdict for rush-week Monsters Inc. rares that spiked on prerelease aggro results: sell or hold until week 2 data confirms whether the spike is justified.
GODEEPER: For the deep breakdown of Monsters Inc. card mechanics and which characters play best in 60-card constructed, check the Attack of the Vine Monsters Inc. Character Guide.
Turning Red characters split across Ruby and Sapphire ink in Set 13. Ruby got the aggressive Mei Lee variants; Sapphire picked up the support-oriented characters from the cast.
Ruby Mei Lee cards drew prerelease attention for two reasons: the character is visually striking, and Ruby aggro is a known quantity in the Lorcana meta. Four days post-launch, some Ruby Mei Lee variants are priced above what their competitive role actually justifies.
Wilds Unknown ran the same script. Ruby aggro cards that looked dominant in prerelease sealed often settled to much lower prices by week 2 once the full constructed meta absorbed them. Cards that stayed in top-tier aggro lists held their value; cards that filled a role another card did slightly better got their price cut in half. Before buying any Ruby Mei Lee single, figure out whether it's doing something irreplaceable or just filling a role an existing Ruby staple already covers.
Sapphire Turning Red support cards are less hyped and cheaper. If any of them enable a Sapphire-heavy archetype in the Attack of the Vine meta, week 1 prices will look like a steal in hindsight. Low-risk buys right now, with modest upside if the meta breaks that way.
Verdict: buy Sapphire Turning Red support if you've identified specific roles. Hold off on Ruby Mei Lee singles that already spiked on prerelease results until week 2 data arrives.
Winnie the Pooh's Hunny cast anchors much of the new Amethyst content in Attack of the Vine. Amethyst has always been Lorcana's control and toolbox color, and the Hunny package fits that role well -- Christopher Robin, an Amethyst/Sapphire legendary, lets a deck ignore the normal two-ink limit to run any Hunny-classified character regardless of its printed ink.
Christopher Robin and Winnie the Pooh & Piglet are drawing the most collector attention, partly because the Hunny classification is entirely new to the game and partly because the cross-ink tutoring plan is already showing up in community deckbuilding threads this week.
Competitive Amethyst pricing is calmer than Ruby or Emerald right now. Part of that is structural: control and toolbox decks take longer to evaluate because you need a complete meta picture before knowing which reactive pieces actually earn their slots. That makes week 1 a genuinely good time to buy Amethyst pieces if you've done the research on what the archetype needs. Hype hasn't pushed these prices up yet the way it does for aggressive cards.
Collector Hunny singles follow a similar new-mechanic logic to the Monsters Inc. debut prints. Winnie the Pooh & Piglet Enchanted in particular has drawn attention comparable to the Sulley and Boo prints.
Verdict for Hunny competitive singles: buy now if you've identified specific pieces for a Christopher Robin build or Amethyst control shell. Week 1 pricing on Amethyst pieces is about as good as it gets before meta confirmation drives demand.
Verdict for Hunny Enchanted prints: week 2 pricing should be 15-20% lower, so patience pays here too -- unless you want a first-print copy and don't want to risk missing it.
Three categories consistently disappoint as week 1 buys in any Lorcana launch.
Sealed product above MSRP. Displays priced above $143 MSRP will come down. The distributor pipeline catches up within 10-14 days. Paying a 20% markup on sealed product right now to open it for singles that are also at peak prices is the worst value play available.
Rush-week aggro singles without week 2 confirmation. Prerelease and launch weekend skew heavily toward aggressive decks because limited-format sealed rewards speed. Cards that looked dominant in sealed but don't have a clear constructed home will drop when full meta data arrives. Buying on prerelease hype alone is speculative.
Repeat-franchise Enchanted prints at launch prices. Enchanted cards from characters who already have prior Enchanted appearances have the least floor protection. These will settle lower once week-1 demand fades -- there's simply no reason to pay peak now.
Week 1 is for selling cards you've pulled, not buying cards at their highest prices. The exceptions are competitive commons you've identified as format staples and debut-franchise Enchanted prints you genuinely want for your collection.
For the Disney Lorcana complete guide 2026, the broader context on how Lorcana's market behaves across set cycles is covered in the Deck Building and Best Cards sections.
Should I buy Attack of the Vine Iconic cards in week 1? No. Iconic card prices peak at launch and drop significantly over the following 2-3 weeks as pack supply increases and day-one hype fades. Based on Wilds Unknown precedent, Iconic cards dropped 30-50% from their peak prices over 4-6 weeks. Waiting until week 3 or later will almost always deliver a lower price than buying now.
When do Attack of the Vine card prices stabilize? Most non-Iconic, non-Enchanted Attack of the Vine singles stabilize within 7-10 days of the July 24 launch. Enchanted prices typically settle 2-3 weeks post-launch as sealed product opens and supply reaches the singles market. Iconic cards take 4-6 weeks to find their floor, particularly if any card sees consistent competitive play.
What are the best Attack of the Vine singles to buy right now? Competitive commons and uncommons in week 1 are the safest buys because prices are already near their floor. Cards with clear roles in established archetypes are preferable to speculative picks. Enchanted cards from Monsters Inc. debut characters are also reasonable buys if you want them for display, since their collector floor is stronger than repeat-franchise Enchanted prints.
Are Monsters Inc. Enchanted cards a good buy in week 1? Sulley and Boo Enchanted cards have the strongest collector floor of any Set 13 Enchanted prints. With no prior Enchanted printing in Lorcana, collectors have one version to target. That floor provides some price protection against steep drops. Week 2 pricing should still be 15-25% lower, so patience helps, but these are not high-risk buys at current prices.
Will Attack of the Vine singles get cheaper over time? Most will, with exceptions. Competitive staples that see consistent tournament play can hold or rise slightly as demand concentrates. Enchanted cards from debut franchises tend to hold value better than repeat characters. Iconics historically drop 30-50% from launch-week peaks. Commons and uncommons outside the competitive meta will trend toward bulk prices within 30 days.
Should I sell Attack of the Vine cards I pulled at prerelease? If you pulled an Iconic or a high-demand Enchanted at prerelease, selling in the first 4-5 days post-launch often captures peak prices. Cards that spiked on rush-week aggro hype rather than lasting competitive value are also good early sells before week 2 meta corrections arrive and similar cards prove they fill the same role more efficiently.
What is the week 1 market pattern for new Lorcana sets? Week 1 follows a consistent arc: Iconic and Enchanted prices peak at or just after launch, then fall as more sealed product enters the market. Competitive commons spike briefly if week 2 meta solidifies around specific archetypes, then normalize. Casual singles rarely spike at all. The buyers who wait 2-3 weeks consistently get better prices than day-one buyers outside of competitive commons.
About the author

TCG Deck Analyst
Former card game tournament organiser turned analyst. Covers One Piece TCG meta, deck efficiency, and card valuation. Builds spreadsheets for decks most people just play.
Disclaimer
This article is published for informational and entertainment purposes. It does not constitute professional financial, legal, or technical advice. Game performance, online services, patch schedules, and store listings change. Verify critical details (pricing, system requirements, regional availability) with publishers and storefronts before you buy. Affiliate links, where present, help support our editorial work and are labelled in our affiliate disclosure.